Please complete your profile to unlock commenting and other important features.

Please select your date of birth for special perks on your birthday. Your username will be your unique profile link and will be publicly used in comments.
Narcity Pro

This is a Pro feature.

Time to level up your local game with Narcity Pro.

Pro

$5/month

$40/year

  • Everything in the Free plan
  • Ad-free reading and browsing
  • Unlimited access to all content including AI summaries
  • Directly support our local and national reporting and become a Patron
  • Cancel anytime.
For Pro members only Pro
Summary

BC Woman Claims Birth Control Patch Gave Her Permanent Injuries & Is Suing 2 Pharma Companies

She claims that the companies are liable for a severe blood clot she suffered.

A birth control patch.

A birth control patch.

Editor

Two pharmaceutical companies that tried to dismiss a lawsuit by a B.C. woman, who claimed she suffered a severe blood clot from a birth control patch, will go to trial after their appeal was rejected by a judge.

The decision said that the woman, Lakota James, was prescribed a birth control patch called EVRA.

James said that a few weeks after she started using the hormonal birth control patch, she had a blood clot. The clot, known as a "venous sinus thrombosis," left her with permanent injuries, she claimed.

After the blood clot, James brought a product liability claim against the pharmaceutical companies Johnson & Johnson, and Janssen, claiming negligent design, negligent manufacture and failure to warn.

In response, the pharmaceutical companies applied to strike James' claims due to a "failure to plead the material facts necessary to support the causes of action."

They also sought to dismiss the claim entirely, arguing that there was no "genuine issue" for trial.

In March 2021, the judge dismissed the companies' application to strike her claims, with the expectation of one.

The pharmaceutical companies then attempted to challenge the judge's conclusion — and were dismissed again on March 28, 2022.

The companies "refused to participate in discovery prior to the determination of their application," the decision added.

James' theory is that the EVRA patch delivers a much higher dose of estrogen and creates a much higher risk of blood clots than oral contraceptives, according to court documents.

She claims, with this higher risk, that the product doesn't have "adequate warning."

The judge in the decision said that there will need to be expert evidence at the trial to prove this theory.

Now that this appeal is dismissed, the lawsuit can proceed to trial.

This article's cover image was used for illustrative purposes only.

Explore this list   👀

    • Editor

      Morgan Leet (she/her) is an Editor for Narcity Media Group. After graduating from Carleton University’s School of Journalism and Communication, she jumped into fulfilling her dream as a journalist, merging her passion for travelling with writing. After working in the print media world on Canada’s East Coast, she joined Narcity with a move to B.C., drawn to the beauty of Western Canada. Since then, she's documented her experience moving to Vancouver, covering everything from local events to bucket-list travel destinations across Canada's West Coast.
    Advertisement Content

    4 ways Canada's pharmacists are equipped to help support women's health

    You may be surprised how much they can do.

    So many child & baby products are being recalled in Canada after 10 deaths​

    The items were sold at Walmart, Costco, Amazon, Dollarama and more.

    This enchanting small town set on a BC island was named among North America's 'most peaceful'

    Sandy beaches, ancient forests and a cozy town — anyone?. 🌲

    This Ontario gem with waterfront towns and beaches is one of Canada's 'best' spots to live

    It has "large" homes "priced much lower" than major Canadian cities.